Miro gives teams a powerful canvas. ALLO gives the project a readable shape.

Miro is a broad platform for workshops, diagrams, planning, and AI-assisted collaboration. ALLO is more focused: arrange the files, drafts, feedback, and project context so another person can open one canvas and understand the work.

A workshop board is easy to start. The harder part is making it useful later.

Miro is fast and flexible when a group is exploring together. The problem is not the infinite canvas itself. The problem starts when raw workshop material becomes the project handoff. Someone who missed the session still has to find the relevant frames, understand what changed, and work out which material matters now.

ALLO gives ongoing visual work a reading path.

Use a freeform whiteboard when the team needs open space. Use a page canvas when the work needs sequence. Connect that canvas to the project, then share the part people need to understand instead of asking them to navigate the history of the board.

Both products bring AI onto the canvas. They organize the result differently.

Miro is building a broad AI collaboration layer for generating, transforming, and organizing work across the board. ALLO keeps generated documents, images, tables, audio, and webpages beside the files and references that shaped them, so the output becomes part of a shared project rather than another private answer.

More output makes shared context more valuable.

When every participant can produce more drafts and directions, the team does not need another place to generate. It needs a view that shows what belongs together, what changed, and what another person should look at first.

Choose Miro when facilitation and breadth matter most.

Miro is the stronger choice for large workshops, design sprints, diagramming, voting, timers, breakout activities, and teams that want a mature visual platform with a broad template and integration ecosystem.

Miro also supports structured work through Kanban, Table, and Timeline formats. Do not choose ALLO on the outdated assumption that Miro is only a sticky-note board.

Choose ALLO when the work must remain readable after the session.

ALLO is focused on file-heavy visual projects that continue across days or months. The brief, references, drafts, AI output, comments, and current direction can stay together on a canvas connected to the project views the team uses to track the work.

Honest comparison.

ALLOMiro
CanvasPage canvases and freeform whiteboardsInfinite boards with frames and multiple canvas formats
Kanban / Timeline / List viewsKanban, Timeline, List, Calendar, and Dashboard project viewsKanban, Table, and Timeline formats on the board
Project managementProject views connected directly to canvasesStructured planning on the board, plus integrations and connected workflows
OKRs / GoalsNative Goals connected to projects and canvasesNot a core goal-management system; usually handled with templates or integrations
CalendarNative project calendar viewNo dedicated project calendar; teams use timelines, templates, or integrations
Real-time collaborationYesYes
File-heavy canvasA core project modelFiles are supported inside a broader collaboration platform
Sticky-note workshop toolsAvailable, but not the main product depthA core strength
Voting, timers, facilitationLimitedExtensive
Client / guest accessPlan- and permission-based canvas sharingVisitors and guests with access depending on plan and board settings
AI philosophyCreate project objects beside the sources and people who need themBroad canvas AI for generation, transformation, agents, and workflows
PricingSee current ALLO plansSee current Miro plans
Best forOngoing visual projects that need a clear shared viewWorkshops, diagramming, planning, and broad visual collaboration
Use Miro when the session needs a facilitator. Use ALLO when the project needs to explain itself.

Already using Miro? Move the material that still matters.

ALLO does not currently offer a one-click Miro importer. Teams usually bring over the brief, selected references, unresolved questions, and files that need to stay visible as the project continues.

Frequently asked.

Should we replace Miro entirely?
Not when workshops, facilitation, or diagramming are central to the team. Miro can remain the live collaboration tool, while ALLO holds the ongoing visual project that people need to revisit and share afterward.
Can ALLO match Miro's voting, timers, and facilitation tools?
No. ALLO supports live collaboration, comments, and reactions, but it does not match Miro's depth of workshop activities, voting, timers, and facilitation patterns.
How should we compare pricing?
Check the current plans on both sites and compare the workflow you actually need. Miro pricing reflects a broad collaboration platform. ALLO plans combine workspace creation, sharing permissions, project history, storage, administration, and optional AI capacity.
Can clients access ALLO canvases without learning the whole product?
Yes, when the selected plan and sharing settings allow it. Arrange the canvas before sending the link so the client sees a clear body of work rather than the raw history of the team session.

The honest version

Miro is the more complete general-purpose visual collaboration platform. Choose ALLO when the recurring problem is turning evolving, file-heavy work into a project another person can open and understand.

Give the project a shape people can follow.

Free to start. No credit card.